CrimeTalk

An educational resource for students and staff studying the sociology of crime, deviance and social censure, criminology, sociology of law and socio-legal studies;  the intriguing stuff that made the subject fascinating in the first place. So much of this has now become political that we also discuss politics.

Interesting data

Miranda, Manning and the media

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

On this site, we have already noted the growing overlap between media and politics in several articles, in the Editor's blog. But the present threat to freedom of speech in the UK and USA, or more precisely the legal right of citizens, including journalists and bloggers, to criticize government policies and actions is a major one. It comes from a Conservative government, renewing the Blairite poodling up to the USA that the vast majority in the UK despised. Labour is perfectly capable of it though, as they proved over their last turn in office. The Tories though are open and shameless about it; indeed, they don't even see the issue.

And who now is the target? Why, surprise, surprise, it is one of the leading critics of Obama's growing authoritarian practices, including suppression of whistleblowing at all costs: Glenn Greenwald, a writer reviewed on this website and only a 'journalist' since he started to work for The Guardian on the Snowden case. The US and our Tories didn't feel confident to go for him directly so they went for his partner, a Brazilian, David Miranda. How strategic and cheap! Smear the critic implicitly by revealing him as gay, and feed the age-old censorious link between radical politics and sexual deviance!

This all happens on the day the American with a conscience about the open slaughtering of civilians, Bradley Manning, is given 35 years for being a man of honour. Maybe he will turn out to be America's Mandela? In the meantime, all we can do is condemn in the strongest possible terms this attempt to crush the legitimate and peaceful critique of Anglo-American authoritarianism.

The piece below by the editor of the newspaper most involved, Alan Rusbridger of The Guardian needs to be recorded and read as an insight into the extent of our politicians' insecurity about the moral validity and even political integrity of their actions.

David Miranda, schedule 7 and the danger that all reporters now face

 

The Leveson Report and some responses

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

Newspaper editors sign up to Leveson recommendations

David Cameron tells editors: implement Leveson to avoid press law

 Leveson report: the speed read

Lord Justice Leveson's 1,987-page report establishes the findings of his 17-month inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press. Jane Martinson offers a five-minute guide to exactly what the report says about the key issues

Leveson report - executive summary

Executive summary of Lord Justice Leveson's report on the 'culture, practices and ethics of the press'

All the above, helpfully and thankfully, easily available on The Guardian website.... and much more.

 

Robert Francis, the Texan judge closing America's jails

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

 

Robert Francis, the Texan judge closing America's jails

Here is an excerpt from this Guardian story about the conservatives now aligning with liberals to reduce incarceration and the costs of prison:

"......Until recently, these people would have been discarded in overcrowded prisons. After all they were caught in Texas – the toughest state of a nation that locks up more offenders than any other in the world, with more than one in every 100 adults behind bars. Instead they receive counselling and assistance with housing and employment, although they can be sent back to jail if they fail drug tests, abscond or reoffend. One woman, a crystal meth addict, tells me the sessions in court are like walking on eggshells. But there are small incentives for those doing well, such as $10 gift vouchers or – on the day I visited – barbecue lunch out with Francis. "These people have to believe we care and want them to succeed," he tells me later. "Once they believe in me they can start to change."

They are beneficiaries of a revolution in justice sweeping the United States, one with illuminating lessons for Britain. It is a revolt led by hardline conservatives who have declared prison a sign of state failure. They say it is an inefficient use of taxpayers' money when the same people, often damaged by drink, drugs, mental health problems or chaotic backgrounds, return there again and again.

Remarkably, this revolution was unleashed in "hang 'em high" Texas, which prides itself on its toughness and still holds more executions than other states. But instead of building more prisons and jailing ever more people, Texas is now diverting funds to sophisticated rehabilitation programmes to reduce recidivism. Money has been poured into probation, parole and specialist services for addicts, the mentally ill, women and veterans. And it has worked: figures show even violent crime dropping at more than twice the national average, while cutting costs and reducing prison populations.

In the process, right-wingers have allied with liberals who long advocated such an approach, detoxifying one of the most poisonous political debates at a time when US party divisions have never been sharper. "This used to be one of the most emotive and ideologically divisive issues in the country," says Adam Gelb of the Pew Center on the States, a social-policy research charity which is backing the initiative. "We are starting to see the triumph of sound science over soundbites.

"There is not agreement on the causes of crime or even the purpose of punishment," Gelb continues, "but there is agreement on the solutions. Liberals and conservatives are getting to the same destination from very different routes." "

Text Size